The U.S. Supreme Court recently issued a landmark decision in Garland v. Cargill that impacts gun owners across Wisconsin and the nation. As Madison criminal defense attorneys, we’re breaking down what this ruling means for you and your rights under both federal and state law.
Understanding the Bump Stock Decision
In a 6-3 decision, the Supreme Court ruled that bump stocks – devices that allow semi-automatic rifles to fire more rapidly – cannot be classified as “machineguns” under federal law. This decision overturns a Trump-era ban on these devices that was implemented following the 2017 Las Vegas mass shooting.
What Are Bump Stocks?
A bump stock is an accessory that replaces a rifle’s standard stock (the part held against the shoulder). It allows the rifle to slide back and forth, using the weapon’s recoil to help the shooter fire more rapidly. While bump stocks can increase a rifle’s rate of fire to 400-800 rounds per minute, the Court found they don’t meet the legal definition of a machine gun because they still require the trigger to be engaged for each shot.
Key Points of the Decision
The Court’s ruling centered on two main issues:
– The legal definition of a “machinegun” requires it to fire multiple shots with a “single function of the trigger”
– Bump stocks don’t qualify because they still require the trigger to be released and reset between shots
– The Court rejected arguments that bump stocks make weapons fire “automatically” in the way machine guns do
What This Means for Wisconsin Gun Owners
While this federal ruling is significant, Wisconsin gun owners should understand:
– State and local regulations may still apply to bump stocks and similar devices
– The decision doesn’t affect other firearms regulations or restrictions
– Legal questions about firearms modifications remain complex
Why Legal Representation Matters
If you’re facing weapons-related charges in Wisconsin, this case illustrates why experienced legal counsel is crucial:
– Firearms laws are technically complex and constantly evolving
– State and federal regulations may differ
– Technical distinctions can have major legal implications
– Courts’ interpretations of laws can change significantly
Protecting Your Rights
At DK Anderson, S.C., we understand the complexities of Wisconsin weapons laws and how they interact with federal regulations. Our experienced criminal defense team stays current with evolving legal standards to provide the strongest possible defense for our clients.
If you’re facing weapons-related charges or have questions about your rights under Wisconsin law, contact our Madison office for a consultation. We serve clients throughout Southern Wisconsin with skilled, knowledgeable criminal defense representation.